Actionstep vs Smokeball: Workflow Automation vs Automatic Time Capture
Detailed comparison of Actionstep and Smokeball for law firms. We compare workflow automation, automatic time tracking, document templates, pricing, and best fit.
Two Efficiency Approaches from the Southern Hemisphere
Actionstep, founded in 2004 in Auckland, New Zealand, serves thousands of firms across the US, UK, Australia, and New Zealand. Its core value proposition is workflow automation: firms define how matters progress through practice-area-specific workflows with conditional branching, parallel tasks, automated document generation, and deadline management. The platform also includes built-in legal accounting with trust, general ledger, and bank reconciliation. Actionstep is strongest for mid-size firms (10-100 attorneys) handling repeatable matter types at volume. Smokeball, founded in Australia and now headquartered in Chicago, serves small to mid-size firms primarily in the US, Australia, and UK. Its core value proposition is automatic time tracking: a background service monitors all computer activity and creates billable time entries without manual effort. Smokeball also includes 700+ pre-built legal document templates with smart field automation. The platform is strongest for small firms (1-15 attorneys) where untracked billable time represents significant revenue leakage. Both platforms reflect the efficiency-minded culture of the Australian and New Zealand legal markets, where firms operate leaner than their American counterparts and technology adoption for efficiency is higher.
Quick Comparison Overview
| Feature | Actionstep | Smokeball |
|---|---|---|
| pricing | Custom quotes, typically $69-$99+/user/mo with implementation fees | Bill $39/user/mo, Boost $89/user/mo, Grow $149/user/mo (billed annually) |
| bestFor |